Hi Emily - you've done some interesting digging here re. the Harryhausen content. Just a tip for future critiques - here you appear to be writing two different analyses - one is a nuts and bolts insight into the history of the special effects, and then you have a short final section on the socio-historical aspect of Kong in regards to its treatment of race representation. What you need to do is decide on the focus of your review before you start it and try and build a more structured discussion, so not lots of interesting factoids, but something specific explored in detail. It is always better to 'say more about less' than 'less about more'. :)
Hi Emily - you've done some interesting digging here re. the Harryhausen content. Just a tip for future critiques - here you appear to be writing two different analyses - one is a nuts and bolts insight into the history of the special effects, and then you have a short final section on the socio-historical aspect of Kong in regards to its treatment of race representation. What you need to do is decide on the focus of your review before you start it and try and build a more structured discussion, so not lots of interesting factoids, but something specific explored in detail. It is always better to 'say more about less' than 'less about more'. :)
ReplyDeleteI found this an interesting read Emily :)
ReplyDelete